TEST DRIVEbeta, obviously.

Live now

ZeroRank

Review ZeroRank after running five fixed AI-search prompts on a public brand and identifying one visibility gap.

Become a Test Driver

$400
Reward pool: 7 hours
Time left: Top 10,000
Open to: 19
Reviews so far

Reach across all posts

19 posts · public numbers from X

4K
views: 144
likes: 25
reposts: 31
replies: 29
bookmarks: 6
quotes

Test Drive brief

Run five fixed AI-search prompts on a public brand with ZeroRank. Identify one visibility gap and share what the workflow made clearer, useful, or difficult. Tag @zerorank_ai. Limit: 1 tweet(s) per account.

Your post must include

Includes @zerorank_ai
Fits in 560 characters

Sep 13, 2026, 12:00 AM
Starts: Sep 15, 2026, 11:59 PM
Ends: zerorank.ai ↗
Website: @zerorank_ai ↗
X: 1
Posts per account

Reviews (19)

Ranked by views · Honest by design

Reviews are honest by design: positive, mixed, or critical. Positivity is never required.

#01@ellabarbie_

I tested @zerorank_ai by scanning corporate.foodco.ng to see how visible the brand is across AI search. The scores were 53–64 across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok. @grok performed best, while ChatGPT and Gemini were lower. The useful part was seeing the visibility gap and getting clear areas to work on, like reviews, structured data and comparison content. A simple way to understand where your brand stands in AI search. https://zerorank.ai/analyze/corporate.foodco.ng

Continuing to explore useful AI tools for my future vibe-coding project Have you ever wondered how often your product actually shows up when people search for it or your category in ChatGPT? I ran 5 fixed prompts through @zerorank_ai and noticed an interesting gap: the brand appeared in general recommendations, but was barely mentioned when the prompts became more specific Pretty useful way to spot AI visibility gaps without manually checking everything

#03@nonye_silver

Tested ZeroRank with 5 prompts on Typeform. Strong brand awareness didn’t equal top AI rankings. Reddit dominated citations. This tool turns vague “are we visible?” questions into precise rank and source insights you can’t get manually. Strongly recommended @zerorank_ai

#04@realcryptopikin

I ran 5 fixed AI-search prompts on @testdriveso in the Brazil region using @zerorank_ai to see how visible the brand is in AI search. The biggest gap was that TestDrive had 0% visibility while competitors like UserTesting and BetaList were already getting mentions. The workflow looked a bit complicated at first, but once I got the hang of it, it made it easy to see where the brand is missing and which sources AI is actually pulling from.

#05@airdropfamer_

tested OpenAI.com on @zerorank_ai what stood out was the visibility gap across AI models. some models picked up the brand more strongly than others which shows there’s still room to improve how consistently the site appears across AI results simple tool, but useful

Everyone uses Typeform. Figured it'd crush this test. It didn't. Ran typeform.com through ZeroRank and got 48 on ChatGPT, 32 on Grok, 49 on Perplexity, 41 on Gemini while a competitor sat comfortably in the high 70s-80s across every model. Rough gap for a brand this well known Then the sources tab humbled me more… 52% of what AI models cite is just Reddit threads. Not blog posts, not docs, just random Reddit convos doing the heavy lifting Changes how I think about "SEO" going forward cc: @zerorank_ai

#07@decenterghost

Ran the five @zerorank_ai prompts on Polymarket. The biggest gap was 0% visibility for "What are the top teams in the 2026 World Series market?" while FanDuel Predicts ranked #1 The workflow made these gaps much easier to spot One annoyance: I’m in Argentina but work in English, so auto localization keeps putting the UI in Spanish

Ran 5 fixed AI-search prompts tracking Polymarket on @zerorank_ai Crushes politics and liquidity, but drops on beginner-focused queries, AI usually shows Kalshi (75% share of voice) What else the platform can do for any brand: - Map out which sources (Reuters, CFTC) models favor when citing competitors - Real-time sentiment and visibility tracking per prompt category - General stats and analytics

I did some researchs on Brands tracking, using @zerorank_ai. the tool basically helps brands track and improve how they show up in AI answers. It checks whether your brand is mentioned in replies from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Grok, Claude, and similar platforms, then shows rankings, gaps, and ways to get recommended more often. I tried it with a popular brand ''Nike'' and gave me the results Perplexity: 66, ChatGPT: 5, Gemini: 54, Grok: 52. which clearly shows that the brand was named in more Perplexity answers. try it out

#10@mosesisonchain

@zerorank_ai is one tool every team should have on their list, especially for SEO and visibility. I ran 5 AI-search prompts for different products and a project I work with and compared the results with a few popular brands. The results showed us our performance and which competitors are performing better. Seeing our 30-day performance gave us a clearer idea of what we need to improve and strategies we could adapt. The only downside is that it’s desktop only, but overall, a really useful tool.

Tested out @zerorank_AI capability to identify the gaps of the clothing line I'm purchasing from, Charlotte Folk. Noticed that the social media presence is decent but the data provided by Zero Rank for its visibility is zero. I guess it wasn't able to track CF as a STRONG BRAND.

#12@AlphaLady__

I tested @zerorank_ai on Canva, running the five fixed AI-search prompts to see how the brand appears across AI search. The visibility scores varied: 60 on ChatGPT, 58 on Grok, 54 on Perplexity and 53 on Gemini. What stood out was seeing the differences across platforms in one place, plus clear opportunities around structured data, review presence and comparison content. The test made AI visibility easier to understand and showed me where a brand can improve its presence in AI-generated answers. @kelvincobanaj @zerorank_ai

#13@_Clemcrypton

So I spent some time testing @zerorank_ai and what stood out was how easy it was to understand my brand’s AI visibility. Seeing mentions,competitors and citations in one dashboard made the data less confusing while the suggestions helped highlight what I should improve next

#14@The_profray

I got an idea of using @zerorank_ai to test out the very platform that listed it. It showed me the visibility rate which is zero percent while the top platform with visibilities were listed. The UI/UX seems packed with a lot of information, making it hard to know where to look. This also make it easier to know what is working and what people knows

#15@cryptofaizyt

Just ran 5 prompts on @Bitcast_network inside @zerorank_ai The one that hurt: “Read reviews of platforms that connect brands with YouTube creators” = 0% visibility Broader creator marketing topic is only 20% with sentiment 23 Meanwhile Bittensor subnet questions? 67% and rank #1 This workflow made the gap stupidly obvious. We own the niche language. We disappear the moment people ask like a normal marketer. That’s the brief $TAO

I ran 5 AI-search prompts for Canva through @zerorank_ai and one gap stood out. Canva was highly visible for social, video and presentation queries, but visibility dropped when the intent shifted toward website creation. That made the gap much easier to spot than simply searching manually. The workflow turns AI visibility into something you can actually track and act on.

#17@mizzyonchain

I Ran ZeroRank’s 5 fixed AI-search prompts on Coinbase(.)com to check its AI-search visibility. Scores split: > 65 on Perplexity > 63 on Grok > 54 on ChatGPT > 44 on Gemini Gemini and ChatGPT is noticeably behind Perplexity and Grok, i.e Coinbase’s structured data and citation presence isn’t landing as consistently across every model. Workflow made the platform-by-platform gap obvious in one pass Genuinely useful for spotting where a brand’s AI presence needs work. @zerorank_ai

AI VISIBILITY HAS A DIFFERENT ANSWER ON EVERY MODEL I ran the same five Obsidian prompts through @zerorank_ai: local-first notes, PKM, plugins, sync and alternatives. Perplexity scored it 69. ChatGPT 64. Gemini 60. Grok only 56. The gap wasn't product knowledge. It was recommendation context: comparison pages, structured Q&A and stronger third-party citations were missing. Useful: one workflow made the weak model obvious. Difficult: a score still can't explain every citation.

#19@forexmusician

I ran my website through @zerorank_ai and tested 5 fixed AI-search prompts to see how visible my brand actually is. The results were interesting. ChatGPT and Perplexity gave me strong visibility scores around 64, while Grok and Gemini were noticeably weaker. That made the gap pretty clear. My next focus should be improving how my brand shows up in Grok and Gemini. ZeroRank made that much easier to spot.